FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 8, 2020

CONTACT
Manisha Sunil, West End Strategy Team
msunil@westendstrategy.com; (202) 417-0171 

SCOTUS Decisions on Ministerial Exception, Contraception Exemptions Erode Religious Freedom Rights

WASHINGTON — Today, the Supreme Court issued two consequential decisions that erode true religious freedom rights for all. Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey Berru distorts the ministerial exception, shielding religious schools from workplace discrimination suits. Likewise, Trump v. Pennsylvania empowers employers to meddle in the personal healthcare decisions of workers and their families under the guise of religious freedom.

Katy Joseph, director of policy & advocacy at Interfaith Alliance, condemned both decisions, stating:

“Today, the Supreme Court issued two decisions causing irreparable harm to the First Amendment right of religious freedom. Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey Berru distorts the ministerial exception beyond recognition, empowering private religious schools to discriminate against staff members and creating a separate set of rules for religious and secular institutions.

An educator grappling with a cancer diagnosis or nearing the age of retirement deserves the same workplace protections regardless of the type of school she works for. This is why Interfaith Alliance joined allies in an amicus brief urging the court to clarify and limit the ministerial exception to ensure that employees of religious schools remain protected under workplace nondiscrimination laws. Most religious schools may not discriminate, but those who do now have carte blanche to break the law under the guise of religious freedom. 

Further, in today’s decision in Trump v. Pennsylvania, the Court failed to protect millions of workers, students, and their families by allowing employers to interfere with reproductive healthcare decisions. Choosing whether and when to use birth control are deeply personal and for many people, informed by religious and moral conviction. Making healthcare decisions based on your personal beliefs and needs is a matter of religious freedom — and no one’s business but your own.

“Both decisions are the result of a conservative campaign to redefine religious freedom into a sword, not a shield, to be wielded against those who live or believe differently. The First Amendment of our constitution protects every American’s ability to believe as we choose, ensuring no one person is forcibly subject to the beliefs of another. The government may not act as the enforcer either, prohibiting the establishment of a state religion and banning policies that offer preferential treatment to religious institutions not available to their secular peers. This measure of fairness, which has enabled diverse religious and nonreligious communities to flourish within the United States for centuries, has lost much of its meaning as the Trump Administration and its allies carve out ever greater exceptions for religious groups.

If you would like to speak with Katy Joseph further, please contact Manisha Sunil at msunil@westendstrategy.com.

###


Interfaith Alliance is a network of people of diverse faiths and beliefs from across the country working together to build a resilient democracy and fulfill America’s promise of religious freedom and civil rights not just for some, but for all. We mobilize powerful coalitions to challenge Christian nationalism and religious extremism, while fostering a better understanding of the healthy boundaries between religion and government. We advocate at all levels of government for an equitable and just America where the freedoms of belief and religious practice are protected, and where all persons are treated with dignity and have the opportunity to thrive. For more information visit interfaithalliance.org.