Sep 19 2006
Washington, September 19 - The Interfaith Alliance released the text of a memo sent jointly to the Republican National Committee and the Democratic National Committee, calling on all political parties and candidates for public office to respect the sanctity of religion in America. This letter comes in response to two recent incidents where candidates have used religion for partisan, political purposes. Representative and U.S. Senate candidate Harold Ford Jr., (D-TN) recently aired a campaign commercial filmed inside a church, and Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline (R) has written a memo in which he targeted pastors to help his campaign's fundraising efforts.
TO: Ken Mehlman, Chairman, The Republican National Committee
Howard Dean, Chairman, The Democratic National Committee
CC: RNC/ DNC Campaign Committees
DATE: September 19, 2006
RE: Partisan Politics and Preserving the Sanctity of Religion and the
Autonomy of Houses of Worship
The recent rush of candidates/political parties- and their often aggressive tactics - to reach out to "people of faith" lures religious organizations and religious leaders into dangerous legal territory.
I write you today out of concern for religion and what the manipulation of religion for partisan gain is doing to Americans of all faith traditions. A partnership between religion and government should preserve the autonomy of houses of worship and ensure that religious institutions are not held hostage to the priorities and interests of federal, state, or local governments. Religion's powerful healing force will be severely compromised if America's shared values are replaced by values that advance only one particular sectarian interest.
Houses of worship are permitted by the IRS, and encouraged by The Interfaith Alliance to provide nonpartisan information to worshippers on a broad range of issues and to encourage civic participation and hold non-partisan voter registrations. The Interfaith Alliance and its 185,000 members from over 75 faith traditions believe it is important that religious leaders encourage their worshipers to cast informed votes this November. Yet when candidates and their supporters use the language of faith to advance partisan interests, or when they seek to emphasize their beliefs as the only truth, Americans and our houses of worship become deeply divided.
For the sake of religion's prophetic voice, The Interfaith Alliance urges you to carefully consider and advise your respective state parties and/or political candidates to:
Refrain from speaking from the pulpit, bema or lectern;
Refrain from using sanctuaries or houses of worship as backdrops for campaign ads;
Refrain from collecting and/or using congregational membership directories;
Refrain from organizing congregants inside a house of worship or distributing partisan material on behalf of a candidate.
The Interfaith Alliance does not mean to suggest that religious leaders should refrain from discussing the important issues of the day with their congregations.
We firmly believe religious leaders can and should encourage an open dialogue about issues important to the country, the communities, and the congregations. Many historians contend that no other form of discourse has held the place of importance in this nation's life as that of preaching. Those of us who deliver meditations, homilies, and sermons have a responsibility to seize teachable moments in our national life -moments like those involved in a national election -as opportunities for talking with people about the basic values that emerge from our sacred scriptures and oral traditions and how those values impact and shape our civic involvement.
If we omit politics from the subjects to which we turn in those moments, people will assume either that politics is not important enough to be included in discussions of matters of faith or, worse still, that religion has nothing to say about politics. Truly great preaching -or any form of religious discourse -can no more ignore the great issues of the day than it can ignore the great texts and truths of the scriptures of the tradition within which it is done. Congregations look to their religious leaders for guidance - spiritual, moral, and otherwise - not manipulation on behalf of political organizations with a partisan agenda.
Our nation can benefit from a recovery of a real, vital, and viable partnership between religion, politics, and government in which each treats the other realms with appreciation and respect without seeking to confuse them or join forces with them.
The core values of the nation's religions ultimately will lend strong support for the core values of our democracy. And our democracy will continue with vitality by allowing religion to remain independent as a contributor to the public's conscience, a facilitator of healing, an advocate for the weakest and poorest among us, and as a community of prophets, priests, and care-givers.
I also point you to our election year guides for political candidates located online at InterfaithAlliance.org/Elections. This resource helps political candidates to draw the distinctions between: Reaching out to religion for personal strength; Respecting all religions publicly; Misusing religion for partisan political purposes; and Misusing religion as a strategy for winning. These guides have been mailed to your respective organizations but we are happy to send you additional copies.
I also make myself or any member of The Interfaith Alliance available to you for further discussion on these important matters.
Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy
President, The Interfaith Alliance
Pastor for Preaching and Worship, Northminster (Baptist) Church (Monroe, LA)
Jan 22 2006
Feb 17 2006
Welton explores the president’s proposed budget with ranking member of the U.S. Senate budget committee Kent Conrad (D-ND) who offers his critique of the proposal.
“A budget is a reflection of a nation’s values. What is going to be supported, what is going to be given federal assistance and what is not,” Sen. Conrad says. “If you look at this budget in those terms and say how is it going to impact people’s lives, we’re cutting education; we’re cutting healthcare for the least among us…does that really reflect the values of the American people?”
Sen. Conrad says his personal faith background also makes the proposed budget cuts a hard thing to swallow.
“I don’t know of any religion who says take from the least among us and give to those who have the most among us,” Sen. Conrad says.
Welton also hears from Rev. Forrest Church, Senior Minister of
Feb 17 2006
Washington, February 17 – The Interfaith Alliance is outraged the North Carolina state Republican Party office is asking religious leaders for their church directories. The request was sent by email Thursday and several area pastors have already said they will not divulge their lists, citing inappropriate entanglement of partisan politics and religion.
In response to this alarming news, Rev. Welton Gaddy, President of The Interfaith Alliance and Pastor for Preaching and Worship at Northminster (Baptist) Church in
“As the pastor of a local congregation, if I found out that my church membership directory was shared with a campaign or political party, I would begin immediate legal action against the campaign or political party. It's a serious mistake to consider worshipers in religious institutions as just another bloc of voters like farmers, labor unions, and corporate executives.
“Collecting church directories intrudes on the integrity of houses of worship and compromises them by classifying them as political organizing tools. I am fearful that initiatives like this by any of the political parties will lure religious organizations and religious leaders into dangerous, unconstitutional territory. Even worse, proponents of such list-gathering are leading religious leaders into the temptation of forfeiting the prophetic voice of religion.
“Furthermore, the national GOP says the collection of church directories is for voter registration efforts. No one bought that defense during the 2004 elections and we won’t buy it in 2006 either. The role of religion and values in the 2004 election was that of a political strategy employed to achieve a political goal – winning an election – which there is no reason to believe that has changed.”