Trump and SCOTUS are Dismantling Church-State Separation. Learn how to fight back on 8/11 at 1:00 - 2:15 pm ET
RegisterThe views and beliefs expressed in this post and all Interfaith Alliance blogs are those held by the author of each respective piece. To learn more about the organizational views, policies and positions of Interfaith Alliance on any issues, please contact info@interfaithalliance.org.
Project 2025 is a federal policy blueprint published in 2023 by then-former Trump administration officials and far right policy professionals, organized by The Heritage Foundation. The 920-page document outlines a detailed policy agenda designed to establish an authoritarian government while curbing civil rights protections. In particular, it is interested in restricting access to abortions and other forms of reproductive healthcare.
Project 2025 calls for the administration to “work with Congress to enact the most robust protections for the unborn…while deploying existing federal powers to protect innocent life and vigorously complying with statutory bans on the federal funding of abortion,” indicating that a total abortion ban is the ultimate aim of this policy agenda. The Trump administration has been trying to meet this goal by implementing a host of policies that make reproductive healthcare inaccessible across the country.
Despite the broad swath of policies that have been implemented already, less than half of Project 2025’s reproductive health agenda has been implemented. The Trump administration is still seeking to make broad policy changes, including withdrawing funding from states that require coverage of abortions, revoking FDA approval for mifepristone, and promoting a pro-life research agenda that “explores the harms” of abortion. Some of these policies are detailed below:
Now, more than ever, it is critical to take a stand to ensure that more of these harmful policies are not enacted. People seeking healthcare should be free to make decisions based on their own beliefs and circumstances, not the religious views of their doctor or legislators. Project 2025 denies Americans that ability by forcing a particular religious belief on all Americans at the cost of people’s health. By fighting for reproductive healthcare, we fight for the religious freedom all Americans are entitled to.
Earlier this year, during the holy month of Ramadan, ICE agents followed Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil home after he broke his fast and forcibly detained him without a warrant. Khalil, a Palestinian activist, was then disappeared into an unmarked vehicle and taken to an unknown location as his pregnant wife watched and pleaded for information. It was later revealed that Khalil had been moved to a detention center in Jena, Louisiana, where he faced deportation. He was held for over three months in poor conditions, missing his graduation and the birth of his first child.
In early July, Ayman Soliman, a former Cincinnati Children’s Hospital chaplain, was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after his asylum status was terminated in June. In response, local faith leaders organized a prayer vigil, rally, and peaceful march; during the march at least 15 protesters were detained by local police and charged with felony rioting.
In a recently published article in the Cambridge Journal of Political Affairs, Adam Hamdan offers a statistical analysis of the role religion plays in Supreme Court cases. The article builds on previous studies examining the interplay between religious beliefs and Supreme Court cases to find that under the Roberts Court, the Supreme Court has sided with religious groups more than previous courts, especially when it comes to Christian groups. This finding mirrors public perception of the Supreme Court, as a recent PEW Research Center study found that 35% of Americans see SCOTUS as friendly toward religion, a significant increase from the 18% of Americans that believed that in 2019.